Energy Security Is Food Security: Why Natural Gas and Fertilizer Must Be a National Priority

In today’s geopolitical landscape, energy policy is no longer just about power generation or emissions targets—it is fundamentally about food security and, by extension, national security.

At the center of this equation sits an often-overlooked truth:
without natural gas, there is no modern fertilizer industry—and without fertilizer, there is no reliable global food supply.

The Natural Gas–Fertilizer Nexus

Nitrogen-based fertilizers, particularly urea and ammonia, are produced using hydrogen derived from natural gas. This is not a marginal input—it is the backbone of global agricultural productivity.

Roughly:
• 70–80% of the cost of nitrogen fertilizer is tied directly to natural gas
• Countries with access to cheap, stable gas supplies dominate fertilizer production

India provides a clear example of this dependency:
• Approximately one-third of India’s natural gas imports are used for fertilizer production

That is not an energy statistic—it is a food security strategy.

Fertilizer Is National Security

Fertilizer determines crop yields. Crop yields determine food prices. Food prices determine political stability.

History has shown repeatedly that:
• Food shortages lead to unrest
• Fertilizer shortages lead to food shortages

This places fertilizer alongside oil and gas as a strategic commodity, not just an agricultural input.

Yet, policy frameworks in many Western countries—especially the United States—still fail to reflect this reality.

The U.S. Gap: Phosphate and Supply Chain Vulnerability

The United States has strong nitrogen fertilizer capabilities thanks to domestic natural gas. But it has a critical vulnerability:
• Phosphate, a key component of fertilizer, is constrained by tariffs and limited domestic supply.

Meanwhile:
• Morocco controls the world’s largest phosphate reserves

If the U.S. is serious about agricultural resilience, it must act decisively:
• Lift tariffs and barriers on phosphate imports
• Secure long-term supply agreements with Morocco
• Rebuild domestic fertilizer production capacity

Without phosphate, nitrogen alone is insufficient. Modern agriculture depends on both.

Energy Policy Has Agricultural Consequences

Recent constraints on LNG development and export capacity introduce a dangerous ripple effect.

Limiting natural gas supply does not just impact energy markets—it:
• Raises fertilizer production costs
• Reduces global fertilizer availability
• Increases food prices, particularly in import-dependent nations

The consequences are global and long-term.

When energy policy restricts natural gas development, it indirectly places pressure on:
• Farmers
• Food systems
• Politically fragile regions already facing food insecurity

What About Renewables and Nuclear?

Renewables and nuclear play a critical role in decarbonizing electricity systems—but they do not currently replace natural gas in fertilizer production at scale.

Fertilizer production requires:
• Hydrogen
• Carbon molecules (for urea)
• Continuous, high-temperature industrial processes

Today, these are overwhelmingly derived from:
• Natural gas
• Coal (in some countries, with higher emissions)

Future pathways—like green hydrogen—are promising but not yet scalable or cost-competitive globally.

The Path Forward

To align energy, agricultural, and national security priorities, governments must act with urgency:
1. Secure Natural Gas Supply
• Expand LNG infrastructure and exports
• Ensure stable pricing for industrial users
2. Strengthen Fertilizer Supply Chains
• Incentivize domestic production
• Diversify import sources for key minerals
3. Reform Trade Policy
• Lift phosphate tariffs
• Deepen strategic partnerships with resource-rich nations like Morocco
4. Recognize Fertilizer as Strategic Infrastructure
• Treat it with the same priority as energy and defense

Conclusion: A Simple Equation

The global system is more interconnected than policy frameworks often admit:

Natural Gas → Fertilizer → Food → Stability

Break any link in that chain, and the consequences are immediate and far-reaching.

Energy security is not just about keeping the lights on.
It is about keeping people fed.

And in the 21st century, food security is national security.

 

Back to blog