New LNG Frontiers: Opportunities and Financial Risks in Israel, Nigeria, and Argentina—Compared to U.S. LNG Under a Potential Trump Administration

by Jonathan Bass

As energy security and decarbonization collide, independent LNG developers (IGOs) are exploring new geographies to meet rising demand. But not all gas-rich regions are created equal.

Israel, Nigeria, and Argentina each present compelling opportunities—but also heightened geopolitical and financial risks, particularly when benchmarked against U.S. Gulf Coast LNG, which could see a more favorable regulatory and financing environment under a Trump administration.

Here’s a country-by-country look at the upside, the challenges, and the real-world likelihood of success.

🇮🇱 Israel: Eastern Mediterranean Tensions and European Diversification

Opportunity
Israel’s offshore reserves—especially Leviathan and Tamar—are among the largest in the Mediterranean. Europe’s pivot away from Russian gas creates a strong commercial case for expanding LNG capacity.

Geopolitical Risks

  • Regional conflict escalation
    Israel’s proximity to Lebanon, Gaza, and Syria creates persistent risk of military escalation. Even limited hostilities can disrupt offshore production platforms or pipeline connections.

  • Border disputes
    Maritime boundaries with Lebanon were only partially resolved in 2022. Further legal or military challenges could stall investments.

  • Domestic political volatility
    Deep polarization and frequent elections can lead to abrupt policy changes, new taxation, or delays in approvals.

Financial Risk vs. U.S. LNG
While Israel benefits from stable alliances with the U.S. and Europe, the baseline security risk is materially higher than the Gulf Coast, where geopolitical disruption is negligible.

Likelihood of Success
Moderate to High, if developers secure long-term offtake agreements and political guarantees that mitigate regional exposure.

🇳🇬 Nigeria: Security Challenges and Governance Complexity

Opportunity
Nigeria has over 200 Tcf of proven gas reserves, a skilled LNG workforce, and decades of successful export through Nigeria LNG (NLNG) on Bonny Island. New FLNG proposals could tap stranded offshore fields.

Geopolitical Risks

  • Militant activity in the Niger Delta
    Pipeline sabotage, kidnappings, and oil theft regularly disrupt operations. LNG terminals are harder targets, but upstream and pipeline security remains a chronic concern.

  • Federal-regional tensions
    Disputes over revenue sharing between the federal government and host communities can delay projects or provoke unrest.

  • Corruption and governance challenges
    Transparency International consistently ranks Nigeria among the more corrupt jurisdictions, creating unpredictability in licensing and permitting.

  • Political transition risk
    Elections often lead to delays in project approvals and changes in investment terms.

Financial Risk vs. U.S. LNG
Nigeria’s combination of physical security threats, opaque regulatory processes, and currency controls makes project bankability significantly weaker than in the U.S., where permitting and contracts are transparent.

Likelihood of Success
Moderate, if sponsors partner with NNPC and supermajors who can navigate local relationships and manage security logistics.

🇦🇷 Argentina: Economic Volatility and Policy Shifts

Opportunity
Vaca Muerta, the world’s second-largest shale play, offers the reserves to underpin 20–25 MTPA of LNG exports over time. Recent political shifts have spurred optimism for reforms that could unlock international investment.

Geopolitical Risks

  • Macro instability
    Decades of sovereign defaults, currency collapses, and runaway inflation create severe uncertainty around financing, cost forecasting, and cash repatriation.

  • Policy unpredictability
    Every administration brings new rules—price controls, export quotas, or tax reforms—which can devastate investor returns.

  • Local opposition
    Environmental and community groups have challenged pipeline and LNG infrastructure, risking legal injunctions.

  • Exposure to regional volatility
    Argentina’s economy is also linked to broader Latin American financial cycles.

Financial Risk vs. U.S. LNG
Even in a protectionist scenario, U.S. Gulf Coast LNG remains dramatically more bankable—offering dollar-based contracts, stable offtake frameworks, and supportive regulatory policy (especially under a Trump administration).

Likelihood of Success
Moderate, contingent on securing sovereign guarantees and creative financial structures to hedge macro risk.

🇺🇸 U.S. LNG Under a Trump Administration: The Baseline for Stability

If Trump is reelected, the LNG industry expects:

  • Faster export permit approvals

  • Less environmental litigation

  • Clearer pathways for pipeline expansion

  • Continued federal advocacy for LNG diplomacy

Financial Implications
✅ Lower cost of capital due to policy clarity
✅ Highly liquid debt markets
✅ Predictable construction timelines
✅ Minimal geopolitical disruption

By comparison, all three emerging markets—Israel, Nigeria, Argentina—carry higher sovereign, security, and policy risk premiums, requiring larger contingencies and higher returns to justify investment.

Bottom Line: Weighing the Opportunity and Risk

For LNG-focused IGOs:

  • Israel offers moderate risk with the strategic upside of European supply security, but conflict exposure can never be fully mitigated.

  • Nigeria combines world-class reserves with extreme complexity—financial partners will demand strong guarantees.

  • Argentina remains the most volatile financially and politically, though reforms could improve the outlook.

While each country is moving to monetize gas reserves, none can match the financial predictability and regulatory stability of U.S. LNG—especially under a pro-export Trump administration.

As LNG demand accelerates through 2030, capital will flow first to projects with the lowest combined geopolitical and financial risk, and for many investors, that remains U.S. Gulf Coast facilities.

Back to Argent LNG Blog